Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Where does that accent come from??

Watching Koffee with Karan the other day, I suddenly realised how affected Ma'am Madhuri Dixit's accent is. But, then it dawned on me that she has been living abroad (phoren/Amrika) for the past few years; so rolling her r's and emphasising on the a's is is only a part of being a NRI, but wearing a saree and doing a namaste keeps her rooted! But I don't blame her because we are gifted with super phonies in Bollywood like the original Bombay boy, Salman Khan who has never really 'lived' abroad but his accent alternates between continents/countries and is never Indian (and you thought appearing shirtless or getting into media brawls or killing chinkaras and sometimes, humans even, could make you look cool) and the pahari babe, Preity Zinta, who claims to hail from Shimla but strangely, has a weird non-desi accent (in fact, it is so unique that categorising it by country/region would be stripping it off its global colour or is it color?? ).
Indians are fortunate enough to be one of those countries where we speak English, almost as a second language in urban areas and speak it fairly well. Considering that English is largely recognised internationally as the language of communication officially, we enjoy a great advantage over some other Asian countries like China and Japan. Added to this is the fact, that we speak English (Ingliss, as we Desis call it) in varying accents across geographical locations. With increasing urbanisation, however, these accent related boundaries are fast disappearing but even today, you can tell apart a Gujju accent from a Marathi's or a Tamil accent from a Mallu's or a Bong accent from a Oriya's. The fascination with the English language is so much and so overpowering that those who cannot speak it well or have been educated in the vernacular are actually looked down upon, socially and professionally. For instance, you could be rejected at the job or marriage market, if you cannot speak the English language fluently; the freer of regional accent, the better. It does not matter if you speak your own native tongue or not but English you must speak. In fact, those who speak English at home are way cooler than those who use the lesser vernacular. It is okay if you haven't read books in your own language but English books (as they are called in India) you must read. In fact, if you say that you are a reader, it is assumed that you read English and only English literature. It's cool to read Tagore, Premchand, Manto but only the English translations. You see, you are not too familiar with your native language, coming from a English speaking background and studying in an English medium school and all. And also, what kind of a person are you, if you donot listen to English music across genres...from hip-hop to punk rock to reggae to lounge, everything is 'in'. Try playing Himesh Reshammiya at any up market club in our metros and if the bouncer does not attack you, toh batana! If you are out of the loop on Hollywood gossip, which prison Paris Hilton went to and who came fifth on American Idol, then even if you show pictures of Rani Mukherjee- Aditya Chopra engagement or interview Ash's tree husband and expose his side of the story after being abandoned by the most beautiful woman in the world, you are still a loser, buddy! (In my case, however, I must clarify that I am game for all kinds of gossip, not following East-West type of boundaries and btw, I have those exclusive pics that I just wrote about..email me with your credit card information for details!)
However, these days, not only do you have to speak English, free of regional accents; you may also adopt a western accent of your choice, which is limited to American and British and may be, the cool, more well known parts of Europe, like France or Spain! African accent is not good enough because the Africas are too similar to us, socio-culturally. Let me emphasise here that speaking good, grammatically correct English is not priority but speaking with an accent is. But, then there are many people like me who just cannot speak one line of English without saying 'yaar' or 'naa' or 'chal' and cannot help but admire with wonder and sneer with disgust, when the youth in Indian cities speak in their fake American accents with such elan. (Swagata, I warn you against bringing up the infamous 'mass communication' or 'classy' story here, as it was a Freudian slip..as an Indian youth almost hitting middle age, it pains me not to be able to speak with a Western accent!)
The insecurity of us, Indians is unbelievable. We want to both, outshine and deitify the West and may be, stealing their accents is the easiest way to infiltrate the Western world and establish our presence!!

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Is being a woman enough?

I write this after hearing of the surprise candidature of one Ms. Pratibha Devisingh Patil as India's next President. Yes, she has been in politics for ages and yes, she is Rajasthan's first woman Governor and the only female Governor in India at the moment and yes, she has Parliamentary experience. But so do the other candidates and some of them, have much greater political presence and experience than she does, then why her?? I can think of no other reason other than the fact of her being a woman that could have triggered this move.
Pronab Mukherjee was not good enough because Ms. Gandhi didn't like him that much and the official version that he forms a strong pillar of the UPA government is not untrue either. Shivraj Patil, close to Ms. Gandhi but too distant from the Left proved to be not too ideal. Karan Singh, aspiring Prez for many years now and if I may say so, an aspiring many things for all his life but we need a little more than just a Prince from Kashmir to make the cut. Sushil Shinde and Narayan Murthy were out of the race, long before it became serious.
In fact, sections of the media are calling the Presidential elections, a battle between the Shekhawats; Patil being married to a Shekhawat herself. Ms. Sonia Gandhi, whose closeness to another Patil and her support for him as Prez was vetoed by the Left allies has referred to Ms. Patil's nomination as a "historic moment" in independent India's 60 year old history, all because she is a WOMAN (she seems to have forgotten that she wouldn't even have thought of a woman candidate, had Shivraj Patil garnered the necessary support). Adding another twist to the tale, the media advisor to the Prime Minister said that the PM's office had already prepared a list of the top 10 women in the country who could be fielded as the UPA Presidential candidate! (Yeah, we believe you!)
Since I did not know who the hell our future Prez is, I decided to find out more about her. However, I found little evidence of her capabilities as a leader, other than the fact that she had a lot of firsts to her credit, by virtue of being a WOMAN. Without taking anything away from her, I, hereby, quote her credentials that has led her to where she is today:
1. First woman Governor of Rajasthan.
2. First woman leader of Opposition in Maharashtra in 1979.
3. She has been Minister in Maharashtra several times and although, it is not mentioned and I am too lazy to research on it, I won't be surprised if she is the first lady to head some of those ministries.
Among her other credentials; she is a lawyer by qualification and as the intensive research team of CNN-IBN will tell us, she was also "TT champion in her college" and that just might won it for her. It is being said that Bhairon Singh Shekhawat may consider it inappropriate to contest against the first "serious woman candidate" and back out. However, the NDA has not supported Patil's candidature and are very much backing Shekhawat as of now.
Pride of Maharashtra or Bahu of Rajasthan, whatever you might call her, I am quite miffed by the selection. We have had a mixed record of Presidents in India, some super achievers and distinguished scholars like Dr. Sarbapalli Radhakrishnan or Dr. Kalam; political big wigs like Dr. Rajendra Prasad and Dr. Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy or government stooges like the infamous Dr. Giani Zail Singh. Yes, we have had no women Presidents in India before, but nominating a person just because of her gender does not speak too well of the status of women in India. There are many other ways of uplifting women in India but this may not be it. One might argue that a President is a mere figurehead, so what's the big deal? But the truth is that, if we have a pro-active President who takes interest in the running of the country and the promotion and protection of the basic rights of people and is not afraid to show dissent and depart from the government line of thinking on issues, if he/she feels that what is being done or proposed to be done is wrong, we, the ordinary people appreciate it. Dr.Kalam represents a "good" President but Giani Zail Singh didn't during his time, when he followed the Indira Gandhi line blindly.
Amulya Ganguly believes that India also needs a political lightweight President and Patil represents that in many ways. Her political career has been largely non-controversial and even as Governor, she has remained non-political. Her opposition of the Rajasthan anti-conversion Bill has also proved her secular credentials. But that apart, there seems to be no other reason why she should be President? Media has reported that she is very loyal to the Gandhi family. Although non-controversial, will she go against Ms. Sonial Gandhi or the UPA she leads, in matters of importance? Given her political/public anonymity and complete lack of presence in the past, we donot know.
Another interesting thing that Rajdeep Sardesai pointed out and I could not agree more is that 65 per cent of India's population being below the age of 35 years, their aspirations are very different. Dr. Kalam was truly a 'peoples President' and represented the dreams and realities of a 21st century Indian and was accepted by the public at large. Pratibha Patil is an unknown somebody who I, as the aam aadmi do not recognise nor identify with. She is the last, politically consensual choice of our politicians made at the very last moment to please the Left, whose preference for a women President we are aware of (Remember, the candidature of Captain Lakshmi Saigal in the previous Prez elections). In fact, it pains me to see the likes of Laloo Prasad Yadav hailing and supporting Patil's candidature, when it is his party that will not let 33 per cent of Parliament seats be reserved for women..So much, for their conecrn for women;s rights..laughable, almost. Pratibha Patil, at 73 does seem like a politically correct choice for President but whether she will win the confidence of the public, if elected, only time will tell. Happy as I am, that a woman may become India's next President; I cannot help but feel sad that the fact of being a woman, is being used and exploited to such a degree that other, more deserving candidates may have been left behind, some of whom, not even in the fray!

I am no political expert...I wrote what I felt and what my limited knowledge permits me..But please do read Amulya Ganguly's piece at http://news.monstersandcritics.com/india/news/article_1317902.php/Pratibha_Patil_The_advantages_of_being_lightweight%0A_COMMENTARY_